TREKONOMICS

Christmas wouldn’t be Christmas without a discussion about the economics of the Star Trek universe, would it?

There’s been a bit of a back-and-forth about this recently, for example here, here and here.

The crux of the issue is that Gillian and Kirk have this exchange in Star Trek IV:

Gillian – Don’t tell me: they don’t use money in the 23rd century?

Kirk – Well, we don’t.

I’ve always been a little suspicious that he’s saying it just to get out of paying for dinner, but it’s a remark that’s come to dominate discussion, and while Scotty can say ‘I just bought a boat’ or Kirk can talk about ‘selling a house’, and while private property clearly still exists, later entries in the series have made it clear: in the Federation, they’ve abolished money. Whether Kirk was joking or not, Picard’s statement ‘A lot has changed in three hundred years. People are no longer obsessed with the accumulation of “things”. We have eliminated hunger, want, the need for possessions’ leaves little room for another reading and  Tom Paris’ ‘When the New World Economy took shape in the late 22nd century and money went the way of the dinosaur, Fort Knox was turned into a museum’ eliminates any last vestige of doubt.

Obviously, this is one of those things that a running series came up with on the fly, rather than something they thought through and intended as a great political statement. And, naturally, the implication of the line is that, taken at face value, it is the most important single fact we know about the Star Trek universe and has to underpin everything else we see.

The Federation has been able to abandon money because, basically, machines do all the work – there’s a real world economic model for this, ‘cybernetic communism’, which envisioned great robot factories replacing all human labour. In Star Trek, the solution is even more direct than that, they have the ‘replicator’, basically a cornucopia that can produce a replica of any item, including food and clothing (it uses technology similar to the transporter to assemble them at the molecular level). We also hear about ‘industrial replicators’, which produce bigger items.

The Federation is a land of abundance – as well as replicators, there are anti-matter engines that produce practically infinite levels of clean energy, there are thousands of habitable planets, so there’s enough land for everyone. It’s what’s known as a ‘post scarcity’ economy. People in Star Trek’s Federation simply don’t need to accumulate money because everything we buy with money now is freely available. Money can’t possibly be for anything. Saving, loaning or investing money would be utterly pointless. Human labour exists – there are doctors, freighter pilots and so on – but whatever motivates them, it’s not a paycheque.

The proponents of cybernetic communism dreamed of a world where everything was leisure. As in this picture, Paul Signac’s In the Time of Harmony:

Image

Note the steam engine at the back. And this is broadly the model Star Trek pushes. The Federation is a work in progress. Its endgame must be something like Iain M Banks’ Culture, an almost unimaginable diverse and abundant galactic utopia, where trillions of citizens can live utterly self-determined lives, and (just as importantly) most are psychologically equipped to cope with such abundance. Banks’ books tended to deal with the very few who don’t quite fit even the most accommodating of all possible societies.

 But this is by no means the only possible result of a work-free society. In the Judge Dredd series, machines do all the work – with the result being pandemic unemployment among the human population, leading to deprivation, desperation and all the social ills we know that can lead to. Mega City One is essentially a sink estate with a population of 800 million people. Some people there dress up as robots and try to sneak into building sites and factories to work.

I think the most interesting Star Trek story is one that’s never been told: what happened the day they invented replicators. It would be an astonishingly disruptive period of history. We saw the fuss this year when someone invented a printable gun. Now imagine that everyone in the world suddenly has access to a device that could produce weapons grade plutonium and an infinite number of dollar bills. It’s hard to imagine an area of life that wouldn’t be affected. The first few years must have seen orgies of excess. The first generation of replicator users in Star Trek must have filled their houses with stuff. Everyone must have sat around in (fake) furs, dripping with diamonds on platinum thrones.

Vance Packard’s book The Hidden Persuaders says that when freezers became widely available in America, people used to keep them stuffed to the brim. It was a new technology, much of this food was quickly ruined – the temperature control wasn’t very precise, and people simply didn’t know how to store things or understand freezer burn. Freezers were hugely successful anyway, because the appeal was psychological, not practical – for a generation that grew up during the Depression, the idea of having enormous amounts of food in the house was astonishingly powerful, even if the food was actually inedible. It was about having, not using.

The first people with replicators would, surely, do the same thing: surround themselves with luxury. The fact that in this brave new world gold and diamonds just pour out a slot in the wall wouldn’t matter for a while: people would cling to the idea gold had an intrinsic value.

In one of his futurist discussion documents, Gene Roddenberry stated that historians had concluded that the average person at any given time had the quality of life of the richest people two hundred years before. It sounds a little too hard-and-fast to hold true to me, but you can see the general principle. The average American now has a lifestyle beyond the dreams of even the elite in Washington’s time – a more varied diet, the ability to travel further and faster, healthier lives, access to (ownership of, in many cases) libraries that dwarf Jefferson’s, less physically demanding jobs, an almost limitless range of entertainments and other leisure activities. Those harking back to the golden age of the framers of the Constitution might be right that their rivers were cleaner, but their drinking water wasn’t.

Looking ahead, Roddenberry’s vision is that in the Star Trek universe, the average citizen lives like one of the super-rich does now.

There’s a problem. As Ben Elton pointed out in Stark, there comes a point where you just hit an absolute limit of needs being met. Your problem becomes that your house is too big and people are living too long. The rich can eat the very best food in the world, all the time. The Tasting Menu at the Fat Duck costs ₤195. If you ate there every night, that would cost you ₤73,000 a year. A vast, obscene and ridiculous amount of money … and about what Mitt Romney makes every weekday. In a world of replicators, the only real obscenity – the price – goes away, as do some of the other problems (getting a reservation, for example) and a citizen of the Federation could just eat that Tasting Menu every night, and with less effort than it takes us to heat a can of soup.

OK, so in two hundred years time, the very best cuisine may be even more exquisite and rare – can you imagine what Heston Blumenthal could serve up if he had a replicator? – but how delicious and novel is it actually possible for food to get? One of the least convincing things for me about Star Trek is that they seem surprised by alien cuisines. Surely, surely, surely they have not lost the impulse many of us have now to seek out new restaurants, to boldly eat what none of our friends have eaten before?

And if the Fat Duck sold press-of-a-button meals, would it still be the Fat Duck? Isn’t the appeal that the meal was prepared, or at least directly overseen, by a top chef? That the location itself is important? Isn’t the point of the Fat Duck that it’s a once in a lifetime experience, not something easy? After a while, I think, the appeal of easy indulgence would dwindle. You can imagine the second generation of replicator users shunning conspicious displays of material wealth, preferring a more austere life. And this is what we see in Star Trek. They eat really boring food.

Image

Faced with technology and leisure time – not to mention a tolerant society – that meant everyone could dress like Lady Gaga if they desired, civilian clothing in Star Trek is astonishingly drab and boring:

Image

People all seem to live in fairly austere, even spartan rooms.

Image

Decoration is confined to a few personal mementoes and perhaps an antique or two. There’s clearly at least a subculture with the urge to live pastorally – colonist farmers, space hippies, even Captain Kirk lives in a log cabin for a while and takes Bones and Spock camping. Modest lifestyles are clearly trendy. People have clearly decided, as individuals and as a society, to life lives of self control. There are no drug addicts (or even smokers), no one is obese. Some kind of Amish-like instinct to value ‘honest work’ exists. Geordi painstakingly builds a model of a sailing ship, and when Data points out he could have just replicated it, we’re supposed to agree with Geordi that Data’s missed the point.

There’s one interesting bottleneck in this abundant society that’s a very visible presence in the Star Trek shows: it’s difficult and desirable to get into Starfleet Academy. This fact alone demonstrates that there’s more in play at the Federation than ‘freedom of choice and self determination’. Yes, you get in on merit … but someone at Starfleet is assessing those merits. Like the ‘good universities’ and financial firms of our era, if you’re trying to get in, it doesn’t seem to hurt if your parents were there. Wesley Crusher is a smart kid, but he fails to get in on merit the one time he tries, and eventually gets into the Academy because Picard has a word and a rule bends. Is that corruption? Perhaps not, but how many other people got in because of a quiet word? Wesley has a huge advantage because he’s surrounded by people in the know who can offer advice. What about some smart, motivated kid who doesn’t know the right people?

Starfleet Academy has a limited – it’s implied that’s it’s a strictly fixed – class size. Exclusion exists, then, in the Federation. You can’t always get what you want.

Star Trek, bless it, does tend to play the same story over and over. The regular characters almost all fall into two categories – people whose parents were in Starfleet and people whose families disapproved so much of them signing up for Starfleet that it led to a family rift. The unplanned corollary of this is that it paints a picture of an Earth were a chunk of the population vocally dislike Starfleet and what it stands for. The reason why is often stated in terms of Starfleet (and those who wish to join) being ‘above itself’. Perhaps, in this post-scarcity economy, the mere fact Starfleet is an exclusive institution is offensive to many people.

But there must be other places where decisions are being made about the allocation of unique resources. While a replicator could be used to make an exact copy of, say, the Mona Lisa, it wouldn’t be the Mona Lisa. So, who gets the one Leonardo painted? There are private art collections in the Federation. In two we see, Requiem for Methuselah and The Most Toys, we even see original Leonardo Da Vinci paintings. Spock can use his tricorder to check they’re not fakes, and presumably *Fajo didn’t acquire his Mona Lisa before knowing for a fact it was the real deal. But how did he acquire it in the first place? He makes a point of saying that he collects things for the bragging rights when he meets other collectors. Other people want it, so why did he get it, not them?

Presumably there’s some law or institution that allocates these things based on … well, we don’t know. It needn’t be nefarious – if Fajo had supplied medicine that saved a million French space colonists, perhaps a grateful French nation granted him the painting. He might be seen as more ‘deserving’ than some art museum that already had ostentatious amounts of fine art.

The Federation, though, is clearly not quite a post-scarcity society. There are limits. There are some materials which can’t be replicated. Starfleet can’t just whisk up a thousand new starships overnight (and, perhaps as pertinently, couldn’t crew them if it did).

Here’s something I noticed:looking closely, most Star Trek episodes are about a planet that lacks something which the Enterprise can supply. Missions typically involve delivering rare medicine to a planet suffering from a plague, key personnel like ambassadors and top scientists to planets where they are needed. Even the more overtly military missions – racing to the aid of a planet under attack – implies that the planets themselves can’t just whisk up a starship to fight or flee. At a more abstract level, the insight Kirk or Picard can bring to a situation clearly makes them rare assets themselves.

The conclusion has to be that this is a function of the Federation being not quite a post-scarcity civilisation. Starfleet has a mission of exploration and scientific discovery, but it – and virtually all the non-Starfleet space travel we see – is actually about redistributing the last few scarce items.

There’s another wrinkle to this, though. As we run down a list of things that can’t be replicated, we hit a really interesting one.

Some of the advocates of cybernetic communism (and plenty of science fiction writers) envisaged a world of male births and artificial wombs. Some feminist writers saw the liberating potential of this. It’s fair to say that most see it as a sign of inhumanity. In the post-Byrne Superman stories (including the movie named after his relaunch, The Man of Steel), Krypton is a world of marvels but the ‘gestation matrix’ represents something of a loss. The loomed Time Lords of the Doctor Who novels are sterile and unimaginative, not vital. The ur-text, of course, is Brave New World, where bottled clones serve the worldstate.

The Federation looks in places like Brave New World on a good day, but it abhors artificial enhancement of human beings. Sure, Geordi has his VISOR, Picard has an artificial heart, but these just restore them to a baseline. Humans have an almost weird phobia about androids that look human. They’ve banned cloning, genetic engineering and all sorts of related technology. The Eugenics Wars seem to have left the human race with a deep distaste for developing posthumans. People train themselves to improve, any machine help is seen as cheating and even unnatural.

If you want a baby in the Federation, it’s going to gestate in a woman’s womb. And there’s a (large, but) limited number of wombs available. Therefore, wombs in the Federation are a valuable, scarce commodity.

Perhaps we could go as far as to infer that it’s this, the scarcity of wombs, that’s led to the sexist attitudes we see in the show in all its incarnations, the marginalisation of women, the society-wide heteronormativity, the short skirts, dancing girls and sanctioned sexual harrassment, the light treatment of rape and attempted rape. If so, the Federation is a society that’s eliminated virtually all the old inequalities, but had an economic system that’s enshrined one of the oldest and most fundamental.

9 responses to “TREKONOMICS

  1. Pingback: However Many Links You Think There Are In This Post, There Are Actually More Links Than That | Gerry Canavan

  2. Excellent piece. You cover a number of things about Trek that have been bothering me for years, not least the sexist, sometimes even misogynistic attitude that prevails, particularly in the original Trek. Of course, each series is very much a reflection of the time it was made, but thinking on how and why it would be like that in the fiction is an interesting thought experiment.

    Economically, they are other oddities. The UFP clearly trades with other cultures, most notably the Ferengi. Latinum is non-replicable, so is valued as a currency (it’s never explained why it’s non-replicable). In the original series, many of the Enterprise’s missions involved the need to acquire sources of dilithium. In the TNG period, this is no longer an issue. Once dilithium became replicable, thousands of mines must have gone out of business, which in Trek terms, means whole mining planets. Yet there is still a need for baseline natural resources – Voyager spends an inordinate amount of resources searching for deuterium, which is really quite common.

    Tom first meets Harry in ‘Caretaker’ by preventing him from being fleeced by Quark. If there’s no need or wealth in this society, what does it matter if he is conned? Is it just a social thing, a matter of kudos for getting a good deal? As you say, the few personal possessions you see are generally antiques. Restaurants still exist. Clearly, there’s value attached to items that are unique, rather than mass-produced (or mass -producable).

    The elitist nature of Starfleet is another matter that intrigues me. I’d like to see a series that focuses on life outside of Starfleet, with ordinary civilians making their way in the universe and having occasional run-ins with the powerful and arrogant organisation. DS9 came close to this, but it was still a Starfleet show, and the characters who had problems with Starfleet were generally non-UFP aliens. The new movie has a hint of this – the bar fight scene shows how cadets can clearly feel they’re above local civs, and Kirk is, initially, not keen on joining the fleet.

    • Just a thought on “gold-pressed latinum”, is it truly non-replicable or is it that the UFP chooses not to replicate it? The reason I mention it is that it is transportable, and if its transportable, then it should be replicable.

      The one thing you could “sell” in a post-scarcity society is new replicator patterns. Did you just cook a steak the old fashioned way and it was absolutely delicious? Save a piece and replicate it, then sell the pattern as a full steak on RepBay.

      Do you design dresses? Sell the pattern for your Spring Line…

  3. I posted a blog post on this exact thing, though nowhere near as in-depth (I haven’t seen much Trek) just a random musing more than anything, about a subject I don’t know the ins and outs of.

    Your post is therefore a lot more informative and nuanced. Thanks for that.

    http://thedarkword.wordpress.com/2013/12/20/money-less-society/

  4. Thank you. Most interesting. But I respectfully disagree. There is not a shortage of wombs. Or rather, there is not a shortage of a means to make people. There is however some intense phobia or cultural taboo against it.

    The Transporter is essentially just a Replicator for people. Going in, the people are reduced to a digital code. That digital code is instantiated into live meat at the destination.

    It should have been trivially easy for them to use the Transporter to repair injuries like Picard’s heart or to give Geordi working eyes. Why not use the Transporter to reverse aging. Or to give everyone a better IQ. But the Federation culture chooses to not do so.

    You could also use a Transporter to translate a human into a perfect copy of a Klingon or Romulan or a Borg. A great tool for espionage. Or translate us into a nonhuman form that’s well adapted to some harsh alien environment.

    It should have been quite easy for them to save a backup of Kirks’ digital code so they could bring him back from the dead. And after the Borg wipe out a Federation fleet, just use the Transporter to restore them from a backup of the transporter code. In fact there was one episode where Riker was created in duplicate.

    Or a Tyrant could use the Transporter to build in loyalty and obedience.

    Of course, there are ethical questions. Like what to do with the malformed instances created by errors in translating the code? Maybe just recycle them into the Transporter? Then erase the logs. Mwwaa Haa Haa.

  5. I’d like to see you address those folks in the Federation that shun replicators and make things the old fashioned way. For example, Robert Picard and the family wine Chateau Picard. The vineyards were fairly large and the wine making process requires a large infrastructure to support.

    Or Sisko’s Creole Kitchen in the French Quarter. Run by Joseph Sisko, it specialized in creole and cajun recipes using real ingredients. That implies a large infrastructure to support one restaurant… Fishing, farming, slaughter house, sausage makers, etc.

    Both of these operations have to assume that the infrastructure is being supplied by people doing it either in trade for the final product, a bottle of wine or a good meal, or they do it for _fun_.

    • There are reasons to do things beyond monetary gain. Both Sisko’s dad and Picard’s brother clearly place value in it – either the craft, the tradition or whatever. At some level, they must enjoy making something special and sharing it.

      The interesting question for me is what rights do they have over what they produce. A year or so back, Rand Paul got into trouble for saying that a diner owner ought to be able to refuse to serve someone on any grounds … which, of course, would include race, religion (if such a thing exists in the Federation) and so on.

      So, does Sisko have the right not to serve people, and how far does that extend? We could see it as ‘fair’ that if there’s one seat left and his best friend and his worst enemy come in, he can give the seat to his friend. Could he refuse to serve all Vulcans, though?

      And are there food safety inspectors? Can anyone just set up a restaurant and serve whatever they like?

    • There are (or were, at some point early on) almost certainly people who would insist, whether it’s scientifically supportable or not, that food from the replicators never tastes as good as “the real thing.” But they may be right; it’s easier for me to imagine that replicators could exist than that they could be perfect and bug-free.

      And presumably someone has to cook it well first so the replicator “knows how.” Maybe this is one reason why there’s so much basic food being served, particularly centuries after talented chefs who can seed the replicators with recipes have become much more rare.

  6. What strikes me as curious (additionally I mean, it’s all interesting) is how the cash-free federation operates when it interacts with a cash-run society.

    This happens on a regular basis in DS9: Starfleet personnel eat and drink at Quarks bar, and Quark actively tries to attract the custom of those that eat elsewhere (Dr Bashir eats primarily at the replimat).

    Does the federation have a store of currency for this sort of thing? Quark – one of Trek’s most prominent capitalists – wouldn’t be chasing individual starfleet customers if it wasn’t for cold hard cash.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s